In a move aimed at enhancing geographic stability for military families, the Department of Defense (DOD) has issued a memorandum directing military branches to evaluate potential reductions in their discretionary permanent change of station (PCS) move budgets. The goal is to increase efficiency and lower costs while addressing the disruptions that accompany frequent relocations.
Tim Dill, performing the duties of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, acknowledged the challenges that PCS moves create for military families, particularly concerning spouse employment. “We understand how disruptive PCS moves can be,” Dill stated. “One of the biggest issues is military spouses often needing to find new jobs at their gaining location, which can lead to underemployment.”
The impact of PCS moves extends beyond employment; families must also secure new homes, educational institutions for their children, and rebuild their community support systems. With this in mind, Dill emphasized the importance of assessing whether some moves are truly necessary for mission accomplishment.
The DOD has allotted four months for military departments to review their PCS budgets and consider modifications to service members’ career pathways, as some career advancements necessitate relocations. The memorandum outlines a target of reducing discretionary PCS budgets by up to 50% by fiscal year 2030, based on the 2026 fiscal budget. This could result in service members relocating less frequently.
Dill clarified that while some PCS moves are mandatory—such as those needed for career development or critical mission fulfillment—the majority (approximately 80%) are classified as discretionary. The focus is on determining potential reductions in these discretionary moves without compromising mission readiness.
In executing this plan, military departments are expected to maintain a balance between achieving budgetary cuts and ensuring the development and readiness of service members. Dill noted, “While reducing PCS moves and associated costs, the military departments must maintain mission readiness.”
Discussions are anticipated to continue regarding the appropriate reductions for each military branch. Dill emphasized that the DOD is committed to considering the potential negative impacts of proposed cuts on service members, their families, and overall mission effectiveness.
“We haven’t directed that any specific course of action must be implemented. We look forward to having that conversation and determining the best way forward,” Dill concluded.
This initiative reflects a broader effort by the Department of Defense to create a more stable environment for military families as they navigate the complexities of military operations.
